Top AI Engineer Staffing Companies

Index.dev vs Qubit Labs: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Index.dev (4.2/5) edges ahead of Qubit Labs (3.7/5) overall. Index.dev is the better choice for startups that want a 30-day refundable trial before committing to a remote ML engineer. Qubit Labs is the stronger option for cost-conscious teams that can write a precise brief for an Eastern European ML hire. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Index.dev vs Qubit Labs: head-to-head summary

Criterion Index.dev Qubit Labs
Founded 2019 2016
HQ London, United Kingdom Kyiv, Ukraine
Team size 30,000+ network 50–100
Rating 4.2 / 5 3.7 / 5
Primary differentiator A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement Recruiting across several lower-cost Eastern European countries
Pricing model Monthly rate per engineer; direct-hire fee option; 30-day trial with refund; rates on request Monthly per engineer with a service fee; rates on request
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow Python, TensorFlow, PyTorch
Industries served SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce, Healthcare, AI labs Technology, Fintech, E-commerce, Gaming, Healthcare

Index.dev vs Qubit Labs: overview

Index.dev

Index.dev is a London company, founded in 2019 according to its own job ads, trading under the legal name Index Soft Limited. It calls itself an AI-first engineering talent platform. Its main network has more than 30,000 engineers in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe, and a separate AI unit supplies Master's and PhD-level people for LLM fine-tuning and RAG work. Every engineer goes through five stages of vetting run by people, including a live screening call and technical validation, and Index.dev says about 1% are accepted. All placements come with a 30-day trial and a full refund if the match fails.

Qubit Labs

Qubit Labs launched in 2016 as a Ukrainian IT outstaffing company and is now listed with headquarters in Tallinn or Kyiv depending on the source. It builds remote dedicated teams in Ukraine, Poland, Moldova, Georgia, Romania and other countries, and in recent years it has added AI staff augmentation and deep tech recruiting. Screening is recruiter-led. The firm is a practical option for cost-conscious teams that know exactly what they want, but it has less proven ML depth than AI-only suppliers.

Services and capabilities: Index.dev vs Qubit Labs

Capability Index.dev Qubit Labs
ML engineers ✓ ✓
LLM / GenAI engineers ✓ ✗
AI agent developers ✗ ✗
MLOps engineers ✗ ✗
Computer vision engineers ✗ ✗
NLP engineers ✗ ✗
Data engineers ✗ ✓
Engineer-led technical screen ✗ ✗
Fractional / part-time experts ✗ ✗
Trial before commitment ✓ ✗
Nearshore time-zone overlap ✓ ✗
Direct hire option ✓ ✗

Tech stack comparison: Index.dev vs Qubit Labs

Framework / platform Index.dev Qubit Labs
PyTorch ✓ ✓
TensorFlow ✓ ✓
LangChain ✓ N/A
Hugging Face ✓ N/A
OpenAI ✓ N/A
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure N/A ✓
Google Cloud ✓ N/A
Databricks N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Index.dev vs Qubit Labs

Criterion Index.dev Qubit Labs
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated engineer, Dedicated team, Direct hire, Trial period Dedicated engineer, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Index.dev vs Qubit Labs

Dimension Index.dev Qubit Labs
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce Technology, Fintech, E-commerce
Best use cases Trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing, Hiring a PhD-level specialist to fine-tune an open-source LLM Hiring a Python ML engineer in Poland or Romania, Building a remote data team outside Ukraine
Typical project type Dedicated engineer Dedicated engineer

Index.dev vs Qubit Labs: pros and cons

Index.dev
+ The 30-day refundable trial is the most generous published trial on this page
+ A separate AI unit for advanced work such as fine-tuning
+ Clients can hire directly as well as contract
- Vetting is human-led but not specifically run by ML engineers
- Network figures and acceptance rates are company claims
- Founding date only appears in job listings
Qubit Labs
+ Hires in several countries, not only Ukraine
+ Lower cost than Western European suppliers
+ Clients say shortlists arrive quickly
- Recruiter-led screening for technical roles
- AI staffing is a recent addition
- Headquarters listed differently across sources

Who should choose Index.dev?

A typical fit: trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing.

A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce, Healthcare, AI labs.

Who should choose Qubit Labs?

A typical fit: hiring a Python ML engineer in Poland or Romania.

Recruiting across several lower-cost Eastern European countries. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Technology, Fintech, E-commerce, Gaming, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: Index.dev vs Qubit Labs

Your situation Recommended choice
You want a working engineer, not a recruiter, to run the technical screen Neither documents an engineer-led screen; run your own technical interview
You need one specialist for a few days a week Neither advertises part-time experts; ask about reduced hours
You need several engineers working as one team Qubit Labs
You want to test an engineer before committing Index.dev
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Index.dev (Not published) vs Qubit Labs (Not published)
Your team works U.S. hours Index.dev
You may want to hire the engineer permanently later Index.dev

Use case fit: Index.dev vs Qubit Labs

Use case Index.dev fit Qubit Labs fit Winner
Trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing Strong Limited Index.dev
Hiring a PhD-level specialist to fine-tune an open-source LLM Strong Strong Both equally
Hiring a Python ML engineer in Poland or Romania Strong Strong Both equally
Building a remote data team outside Ukraine Strong Strong Both equally

Verdict: Index.dev vs Qubit Labs

Index.dev (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Engineer Staffing projects. A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement.

Qubit Labs (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need building a remote data team outside Ukraine. If your situation matches that, Qubit Labs is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Index.dev vs Qubit Labs FAQ

Is Index.dev better than Qubit Labs?

Index.dev (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Index.dev's strongest advantage: the 30-day refundable trial is the most generous published trial on this page. Qubit Labs's strongest advantage: hires in several countries, not only Ukraine.

How do Index.dev and Qubit Labs differ in pricing?

Index.dev uses monthly rate per engineer; direct-hire fee option; 30-day trial with refund; rates on request pricing. Qubit Labs uses monthly per engineer with a service fee; rates on request pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Index.dev or Qubit Labs?

Qubit Labs is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Index.dev and Qubit Labs?

Index.dev's primary differentiator is: a 30-day trial with full refund on every placement. Qubit Labs's primary differentiator is: recruiting across several lower-cost Eastern European countries. They also differ in team size (30,000+ network vs 50–100), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS, Fintech vs Technology, Fintech).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.