Top AI Engineer Staffing Companies

Index.dev vs micro1: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Index.dev (4.2/5) edges ahead of micro1 (3.7/5) overall. Index.dev is the better choice for startups that want a 30-day refundable trial before committing to a remote ML engineer. micro1 is the stronger option for AI teams that need many vetted contributors quickly for evaluation or data work. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Index.dev vs micro1: head-to-head summary

Criterion Index.dev micro1
Founded 2019 2022
HQ London, United Kingdom California, USA
Team size 30,000+ network Estimates range from 11–50 staff to thousands including contractors
Rating 4.2 / 5 3.7 / 5
Primary differentiator A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement Automated AI interviews that screen candidates in high volume
Pricing model Monthly rate per engineer; direct-hire fee option; 30-day trial with refund; rates on request Hourly or monthly per contractor; one-week test option; rates on request
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow Python, PyTorch, OpenAI
Industries served SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce, Healthcare, AI labs AI labs, Technology, SaaS, Finance, Healthcare

Index.dev vs micro1: overview

Index.dev

Index.dev is a London company, founded in 2019 according to its own job ads, trading under the legal name Index Soft Limited. It calls itself an AI-first engineering talent platform. Its main network has more than 30,000 engineers in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe, and a separate AI unit supplies Master's and PhD-level people for LLM fine-tuning and RAG work. Every engineer goes through five stages of vetting run by people, including a live screening call and technical validation, and Index.dev says about 1% are accepted. All placements come with a 30-day trial and a full refund if the match fails.

micro1

micro1 was founded in 2022 by Ali Ansari and is based in California. Its AI recruiter, Zara, runs a structured interview of 20 to 40 minutes with every applicant. The company raised a Series A at a $500 million valuation in September 2025 and now earns most of its revenue supplying vetted experts to AI labs for model training. Engineering teams can still hire through it, but an automated interview is a different thing from a senior engineer reviewing code, and its focus has moved toward lab work.

Services and capabilities: Index.dev vs micro1

Capability Index.dev micro1
ML engineers ✓ ✓
LLM / GenAI engineers ✓ ✓
AI agent developers ✗ ✗
MLOps engineers ✗ ✗
Computer vision engineers ✗ ✗
NLP engineers ✗ ✗
Data engineers ✗ ✗
Engineer-led technical screen ✗ ✗
Fractional / part-time experts ✗ ✗
Trial before commitment ✓ ✓
Nearshore time-zone overlap ✓ ✗
Direct hire option ✓ ✗

Tech stack comparison: Index.dev vs micro1

Framework / platform Index.dev micro1
PyTorch ✓ ✓
TensorFlow ✓ N/A
LangChain ✓ ✓
Hugging Face ✓ N/A
OpenAI ✓ ✓
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure N/A N/A
Google Cloud ✓ N/A
Databricks N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Index.dev vs micro1

Criterion Index.dev micro1
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated engineer, Dedicated team, Direct hire, Trial period Freelance contract, Trial period
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Index.dev vs micro1

Dimension Index.dev micro1
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce AI labs, Technology, SaaS
Best use cases Trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing, Hiring a PhD-level specialist to fine-tune an open-source LLM Hiring twenty LLM evaluators for a model release, Adding a contract ML engineer for a short project
Typical project type Dedicated engineer Freelance contract

Index.dev vs micro1: pros and cons

Index.dev
+ The 30-day refundable trial is the most generous published trial on this page
+ A separate AI unit for advanced work such as fine-tuning
+ Clients can hire directly as well as contract
- Vetting is human-led but not specifically run by ML engineers
- Network figures and acceptance rates are company claims
- Founding date only appears in job listings
micro1
+ Can screen a very large number of candidates fast
+ Experience with AI-lab evaluation work
+ A short trial before a longer contract
- AI interviews replace engineer judgment in the screen
- Most revenue now comes from AI labs, not product teams
- Headquarters is listed differently across sources

Who should choose Index.dev?

A typical fit: trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing.

A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce, Healthcare, AI labs.

Who should choose micro1?

A typical fit: hiring twenty LLM evaluators for a model release.

Automated AI interviews that screen candidates in high volume. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in AI labs, Technology, SaaS, Finance, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: Index.dev vs micro1

Your situation Recommended choice
You want a working engineer, not a recruiter, to run the technical screen Neither documents an engineer-led screen; run your own technical interview
You need one specialist for a few days a week Neither advertises part-time experts; ask about reduced hours
You need several engineers working as one team Neither lists dedicated teams; check team size before signing
You want to test an engineer before committing Both; Index.dev rates higher overall
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Index.dev (Not published) vs micro1 (Not published)
Your team works U.S. hours Index.dev
You may want to hire the engineer permanently later Index.dev

Use case fit: Index.dev vs micro1

Use case Index.dev fit micro1 fit Winner
Trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing Strong Limited Index.dev
Hiring a PhD-level specialist to fine-tune an open-source LLM Strong Strong Both equally
Hiring twenty LLM evaluators for a model release Strong Strong Both equally
Adding a contract ML engineer for a short project Limited Strong micro1

Verdict: Index.dev vs micro1

Index.dev (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Engineer Staffing projects. A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement.

micro1 (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need adding a contract ML engineer for a short project. If your situation matches that, micro1 is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Index.dev vs micro1 FAQ

Is Index.dev better than micro1?

Index.dev (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Index.dev's strongest advantage: the 30-day refundable trial is the most generous published trial on this page. micro1's strongest advantage: can screen a very large number of candidates fast.

How do Index.dev and micro1 differ in pricing?

Index.dev uses monthly rate per engineer; direct-hire fee option; 30-day trial with refund; rates on request pricing. micro1 uses hourly or monthly per contractor; one-week test option; rates on request pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Index.dev or micro1?

Index.dev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Index.dev and micro1?

Index.dev's primary differentiator is: a 30-day trial with full refund on every placement. micro1's primary differentiator is: automated AI interviews that screen candidates in high volume. They also differ in team size (30,000+ network vs Estimates range from 11–50 staff to thousands including contractors), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS, Fintech vs AI labs, Technology).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.