Top AI Engineer Staffing Companies

Index.dev vs KORE1: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Index.dev (4.2/5) edges ahead of KORE1 (3.6/5) overall. Index.dev is the better choice for startups that want a 30-day refundable trial before committing to a remote ML engineer. KORE1 is the stronger option for U.S. companies that want a local agency to recruit ML engineers on contract-to-hire terms. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Index.dev vs KORE1: head-to-head summary

Criterion Index.dev KORE1
Founded 2019 2005
HQ London, United Kingdom Irvine, California, USA
Team size 30,000+ network Not published
Rating 4.2 / 5 3.6 / 5
Primary differentiator A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement A U.S. staffing agency with contract-to-hire terms for AI roles
Pricing model Monthly rate per engineer; direct-hire fee option; 30-day trial with refund; rates on request Contract bill rate or placement fee; rates on request
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow Python, AWS, Azure
Industries served SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce, Healthcare, AI labs Technology, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Finance, Aerospace

Index.dev vs KORE1: overview

Index.dev

Index.dev is a London company, founded in 2019 according to its own job ads, trading under the legal name Index Soft Limited. It calls itself an AI-first engineering talent platform. Its main network has more than 30,000 engineers in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe, and a separate AI unit supplies Master's and PhD-level people for LLM fine-tuning and RAG work. Every engineer goes through five stages of vetting run by people, including a live screening call and technical validation, and Index.dev says about 1% are accepted. All placements come with a 30-day trial and a full refund if the match fails.

KORE1

KORE1 is an IT and professional staffing agency headquartered in Irvine, California. Its own sources give both 1999 and 2005 as starting dates; we use 2005, the year in its company summary. It recruits on contract, contract-to-hire and direct-hire terms across IT, data and AI/ML, with pages for ML, LLM, MLOps and GenAI engineers. KORE1 reports an average time-to-hire of 17 days and 12-month retention of 92% for IT roles. Screening is done by recruiters, and AI is one category among many.

Services and capabilities: Index.dev vs KORE1

Capability Index.dev KORE1
ML engineers ✓ ✓
LLM / GenAI engineers ✓ ✓
AI agent developers ✗ ✗
MLOps engineers ✗ ✓
Computer vision engineers ✗ ✗
NLP engineers ✗ ✗
Data engineers ✗ ✗
Engineer-led technical screen ✗ ✗
Fractional / part-time experts ✗ ✗
Trial before commitment ✓ ✗
Nearshore time-zone overlap ✓ ✗
Direct hire option ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Index.dev vs KORE1

Framework / platform Index.dev KORE1
PyTorch ✓ N/A
TensorFlow ✓ ✓
LangChain ✓ N/A
Hugging Face ✓ N/A
OpenAI ✓ N/A
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure N/A ✓
Google Cloud ✓ ✓
Databricks N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Index.dev vs KORE1

Criterion Index.dev KORE1
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated engineer, Dedicated team, Direct hire, Trial period Contract-to-hire, Direct hire, Freelance contract
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Index.dev vs KORE1

Dimension Index.dev KORE1
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce Technology, Healthcare, Manufacturing
Best use cases Trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing, Hiring a PhD-level specialist to fine-tune an open-source LLM Hiring an on-site ML engineer in Southern California, Bringing in a contract MLOps engineer with a path to permanent
Typical project type Dedicated engineer Contract-to-hire

Index.dev vs KORE1: pros and cons

Index.dev
+ The 30-day refundable trial is the most generous published trial on this page
+ A separate AI unit for advanced work such as fine-tuning
+ Clients can hire directly as well as contract
- Vetting is human-led but not specifically run by ML engineers
- Network figures and acceptance rates are company claims
- Founding date only appears in job listings
KORE1
+ U.S.-based candidates for on-site or hybrid roles
+ Contract-to-hire lets you test before a permanent offer
+ Published time-to-hire figure
- Recruiter-led screening
- AI is one category inside a general staffing business
- U.S. rates, which are higher than nearshore or offshore options

Who should choose Index.dev?

A typical fit: trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing.

A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in SaaS, Fintech, E-commerce, Healthcare, AI labs.

Who should choose KORE1?

A typical fit: hiring an on-site ML engineer in Southern California.

A U.S. staffing agency with contract-to-hire terms for AI roles. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Technology, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Finance, Aerospace.

Decision matrix: Index.dev vs KORE1

Your situation Recommended choice
You want a working engineer, not a recruiter, to run the technical screen Neither documents an engineer-led screen; run your own technical interview
You need one specialist for a few days a week Neither advertises part-time experts; ask about reduced hours
You need several engineers working as one team Neither lists dedicated teams; check team size before signing
You want to test an engineer before committing Index.dev
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Index.dev (Not published) vs KORE1 (Not published)
Your team works U.S. hours Index.dev
You may want to hire the engineer permanently later Both; Index.dev rates higher overall

Use case fit: Index.dev vs KORE1

Use case Index.dev fit KORE1 fit Winner
Trialling a Latin American ML engineer for a month before committing Strong Limited Index.dev
Hiring a PhD-level specialist to fine-tune an open-source LLM Strong Strong Both equally
Hiring an on-site ML engineer in Southern California Strong Strong Both equally
Bringing in a contract MLOps engineer with a path to permanent Limited Strong KORE1

Verdict: Index.dev vs KORE1

Index.dev (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Engineer Staffing projects. A 30-day trial with full refund on every placement.

KORE1 (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need bringing in a contract MLOps engineer with a path to permanent. If your situation matches that, KORE1 is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Index.dev vs KORE1 FAQ

Is Index.dev better than KORE1?

Index.dev (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Index.dev's strongest advantage: the 30-day refundable trial is the most generous published trial on this page. KORE1's strongest advantage: U.S.-based candidates for on-site or hybrid roles.

How do Index.dev and KORE1 differ in pricing?

Index.dev uses monthly rate per engineer; direct-hire fee option; 30-day trial with refund; rates on request pricing. KORE1 uses contract bill rate or placement fee; rates on request pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Index.dev or KORE1?

Index.dev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Index.dev and KORE1?

Index.dev's primary differentiator is: a 30-day trial with full refund on every placement. KORE1's primary differentiator is: a U.S. staffing agency with contract-to-hire terms for AI roles. They also differ in team size (30,000+ network vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS, Fintech vs Technology, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.